Ninja is going hard, the floor is 1 bitcoin now🥷.
BLOCK 974784
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
Translation : Party cancelled.
43 185 sat
Where?
Look at my lizard, I’ll show you my pokemon cards later
Twetch Lizer Corp #2005 | Twetch Market Lizer Corp · Uncommon · Rank 819 · Listed for 69.69 BSV including fees spiderman: take me home?
831 980 sat
LaW cOiN uses the opposite technology to go down a vertical price wall.
Sexy bitch 😍
44 038 sat
Even a flying car should have some sort of internal “plumbing” system so this is rEaL bItCoIn adoption as the Messiah predicted? Right?
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
Bitcoin is bsv
bored... home alone
TWETCH Since its launch in 2006, many attempts have been made to dislodge X from its top spot, with more recent attempts focusing on freer speech and less moderation. These include Gab, Parler, Mastodon, and Truth Social, though these attempts have tended to become topic havens for interest groups that feel marginalized or censored in mainstream spaces.
importantly because people own their data and keys in BSV if they want to migrate data to some new standard overlayed onto BSV they can do this too
it is now underway, full of promise
Looking forward to Lorian @gamaroff launching the Goji wallet for BSV...... 🚀🚀🚀
This will be the successor to Centbee (now no more) which many here will know.
There is a website inviting people to register as 'early adopters' .... Just plug-in your email address to register interest.
I personally think it important to have your BSV in multiple locations.
ChatGPT on BRC-100 and the idea of 'walled gardens' in BSV:
BRC-100 isn't a walled garden; it's an attempt to create a common interface in an open ecosystem.
BSV's underlying protocol doesn't require anyone to use BRC-100. Anyone is free to implement BRC-100, modify their wallet architecture around it, develop a competing standard, or ignore it entirely. If BRC-100 has undesirable properties, those properties should be identified at the level where they actually exist: the specification itself, a particular implementation, or the surrounding ecosystem.
We also need to distinguish "walled garden" from "commonly used standard." If a common interface becomes widely adopted, that doesn't mean the ecosystem has become closed. The Internet would be difficult to describe as a walled garden simply because TCP/IP, HTTP, DNS, TLS, etc. became common standards. The important question is whether alternatives are prohibited or merely less popular.
In an open protocol ecosystem, people are free to experiment. Good implementations can gain adoption, bad implementations can lose it, and competing approaches can emerge. There is no requirement that everyone use the same wallet or even the same application-layer standard.
And realistically, some kind of common wallet/application interface is needed if we want developers to build applications without writing a completely different integration for every wallet. So almost any successful standard could eventually be accused of being a "walled garden" simply because it is successful and widely used.
The real question isn't "Is BRC-100 commonly used?" It is "Does BRC-100 or its ecosystem prevent meaningful competition and user choice?"
That's a much more useful question.
I'm interested in the technology that allows a car to slowly go up a vertical road.
Ethics is a distraction from Twetch games