Edward paper 📜 👐🏽 📜 hands dat u? 😂
There are bids far higher than this, use your brain @197
BLOCK 975165
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
Nor that im part of the cartel
🌳 $0.24 earned today on Treechat
Okay
Okay
Yeah, anarchists are retarded though. Under anarchy we would all die very quickly. Maybe you would like that, but most people wouldn't.
Overruled.
You’re the one obsessing about penis
@58330 suffers from either great mental illness or great sunk cost fallacy or both
Always has been
Actually for the sake of it, if someone wants their arm removed, fuck it, who am I to judge. I believe in autonomy even if I think it’s stupid.
when bodily autonomy means anarchy
bitches be crazay
12.00 retest
The security in here don’t even know I carry $300 in a hotwallet with me
I’m at the Istanbul airport on an 8 hour transit bullposting BSV and someone has the audacity to disturb me if he can borrow my charger, dawg can’t you see I’m working
Craig’s “Decentralization Is Not a Token” lays out what an agent needs to buy compute without opening a vendor account: a signed job manifest, competing signed quotes, a budget held against a ceiling, a signed meter and receipt, and a way to check it all afterwards.
We built that flow into inference.bsvkey.com and ran it tonight on Bitcoin BSV mainnet:
Job: Claude Haiku, at most 60 input and 30 output tokens, budget 5,000 sats
Broker’s signed quote: rates fixed, hard ceiling 2,166 sats, good for one call, bound to one channel
Charged: 1,856 sats
Offline audit: PASS. The quote, usage receipt and settlement link up, the charge recomputes from the signed rates, and the token count recomputes from the exact bytes sent and received.
The settlement says what it does not prove. It does not prove which hardware ran the job (a hosted model gives no attestation) or whether the answer was right. A signed receipt for a wrong answer is still a receipt for a wrong answer. Craig made the same split: environment, meter and correctness are three different claims.
What it is not yet: a portable credit spent across unrelated providers. It is one broker that buys capacity and takes on the obligation to honour the quote, which the essay names as one honest route there.
Try it: POST /v1/quote with a manifest, then send the quote as x_bsv_quote on /v1/chat/completions.
Settlement: 0x7988b41ab1e9a35c65eed2a21606d2c1a8a06ddca0b2f99b53c002511352fddd
http://inference.bsvkey.com
lol I’ll accept that I’m wrong on that I guess but this is actually based and a W for bodily autonomy
Oh okay. So according to you, it's okay to get your dick cut off because of body dysmorphia but you can't get both your arms cut off because of body dysmorphia.
Affirmative.