that's is so true, I'm not very young either and it often take me 2 days to fully recover!
BLOCK 972066
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: Come Over_256k.mp3
I just unfollowed a bunch of people, and it's free!
42 156 sat
😂
My bad, THUGG!
BSV is working on building up the protocol.
At this stage of my life, I need an entire day to recover, too. Even when I drink moderately 5-6 pints. I usually do it Sundays so I will be paid to recover the next day working from home
42 156 sat
I need one Noogie for my collection; may I ask for one?
I'm not - a forum and a network are not the same
Once you bring those things together, the social aspect will just be an add-on to those components.
Media in the market context is when it's easy to use these marketing tools to sell media, / paywall was a great step but there's more needed that has nothing to do with NFTs
Up next — chances for the next draw, not a queue
Leading chances
- SMART SOY - -BLASTER.mp3 — 43.84% chance
- Mad Scientist Eighty-Eight.mp3 — 9.29% chance
- charts_MASTERED.wav — 7.48% chance
- topic of conversation.mp3 — 2.48% chance
- there is no fork.wav — 2.17% chance
📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: DUMB AZ ME.mp3
🌱 Added from
very nice, very good!
Friday is a Frenday but if it's raining then we should call it Frainday!
42 238 sat
just a guess its banned from all the exchanges so I don't think its very liquid
AI will take all the jobs. We've heard this before.
In 1811, English weavers smashed the looms they believed would leave them without work. In the 1960s, the US government set up a national commission to study whether automation would cause mass unemployment. When ATMs arrived, people expected bank tellers to disappear. Every time, the jobs changed, and new ones appeared that nobody had predicted.
One side: This is a panic we've lived through many times. Technology removes tasks, not whole professions. It makes work cheaper and more productive, which creates demand somewhere else. The people predicting the end of work have been wrong for two hundred years, so why would they be right now?
The other side: Earlier machines replaced muscle. This one goes after judgment, writing, analysis, and code, the work we moved into when the machines took the old jobs. It's also spreading in months rather than decades. Even if new jobs appear eventually, "eventually" doesn't help a translator or a junior analyst whose job is gone this year. And it's the entry-level roles, where people used to learn the trade, that are going first.
Maybe both are true. The total number of jobs may survive, while the path into them doesn't.
So which is it: another false alarm, or the first time the alarm is real?
Give your reason, not just your side.
I need one Noogie for my collection; may I ask for one?
I need one Noogie for my collection; may I ask for one?