4 years too late 🥹
BLOCK 973475
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@Bitcoin_Scales:
Just my opinion. The whole world moved on without BSV. Its creator shamed all of us into oblivion with fraud. What do you want me to do about it? Lol
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@BestGoldSignals:
Now, Jack Liu or anyone can build anything on BSV and make a profit because the cost of getting a user is high.
the BOE Sync Lab T+0 will help to cut the cost of acquiring a user --> after that building on BSV may make a profit. Now is suicide
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@human8ty_:
Le fait qu'il ne puisse pas être saisi. C'est là l'essence même fondamentale du Bitcoin. C'est aussi pourquoi le NAR/DAR discrédite automatiquement le pouvoir de BSV. L'indépendance vis-à-vis du système établi est généralisée. « Le chancelier au bord d'un second plan de sauvetage
Did you have this 96844 as a spare as new numbers are in the 200k range?
When I sold 111 this was the other guys number 😝 but imma get my original 910 back 🥰
how did you hear about treechat?
Bring back Lisa too.
Hello @metamitya 😀
Thanks loveeee 🥰💛
like half a mill in retirement savings but im not supposed to touch that yet
Pretty sure you don’t want a bear to hug you
i only have like $12 to my fucking name
Are we cooking 🍳 something Big??
Yay or nay
/poll [yay,nay]
This is too much fun not to increase the prizes to 10 BSV 😂
please send me free noogie too. i am just poor, upper class, first worlder and i need funds for pokemon cards irl
198 118 sat
Welcome back!!!
Is there, a support email for TreeChat or a way of reaching out privately to TreeChat @metamitya ? Tried messaging you privately 7 hours ago but seems like the message was not delivered.
Who should I vote for?
This year, voters are typing that question into chatbots. The New York Times reports that the 2026 midterms may be the first U.S. elections where people use AI chatbots in meaningful numbers. Some photograph their ballot and ask outright.
The worry: experts warn the answers can contain factual errors and may favor candidates who are louder in the local press and on social media. A Cornell professor notes these models are persuasive precisely because they state things clearly, whether or not they're right. Guardrails also bend: one chatbot declined to recommend anyone, then produced candidate rundowns once the question was rephrased.
The defense: in a test of 63,000 prompts, none of the major models would name a candidate when asked who to vote for. And voters have always borrowed judgment, from newspapers, unions, priests, and parents. A chatbot at least answers follow-up questions.
Maybe the real question isn't who you ask, but whether you still check.
What's your counterpoint?
hell yea