BLOCK 975017

A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin

Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.

Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1FgiUa…dxR7

If you dump on me like that again I'm going to report you for abuse.

Is usage enough to determine if it's good? What if there was a bad experience, should that be known? Or will volume over time just show where to go? And if there are competing services, how does it decide?

1GN4KT…u3Sm Unverified · twetch

XRP long term theory

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

Brooz offered 500,000 sats for SaintToshi's ordinal

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

Up next — chances for the next draw, not a queue
Leading chances

  1. MC Binary Barz 2.0.mp3 — 16.23% chance
  2. SMART SOY - REACH OUT.mp3 — 7.83% chance
  3. CLOUDWALKING.wav — 6.79% chance
  4. Chronicles of Chronicle.mp3 — 6.38% chance
  5. Understand it later, build it now.wav — 3.68% chance
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: Neon After Dark.mp3

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

🌱 Added from

1AYT7S…UoG8 Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1J82Vb…ctCJ

gm, why am i seeing this

1FgiUa…dxR7 Unverified · twetch

Looking for bitcoin power users to test out bsvOS. It costs nothing to get started with a fresh OS powered wallet. The faucet lets you claim 25,000 sats which is enough to do some basic operations with bsvOS.

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: 🎵 “ANTÍDOTO (El Flow del Crypto)”.mp3

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1CdETk…vqVS

if payment made, twonk stays in escrow

if all payments made, twonk transfers

if payments not made, twonk reverts out of escrow

201 045 sat
1CdETk…vqVS Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1CdETk…vqVS

then enable the bams bsv21 to be viewable in your twetch assets

1CdETk…vqVS Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pqguf…CTad
Brooz ☕️ 1mo

@259 something similar to this is how you could migrate trades of twonks/bams directly to twetch

$BAMS as a token only issued by you and not for sale publicly.

BAMS balance → BSV-21
→ token output
→ custom spending rules
→ Sonic / authorised renter only - possible by specifying tokens spending rules

1FgiUa…dxR7 Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1G15jb…2UXp

Yes, part of the trust and reputation system. Here's the /long/ answer by AI to give you all the gritty details:

The model: reputation isn't a badge, it's terms
In the bsvOS agent economy, "reputation" means verified history that changes the economic terms you get. No stars, no votes — two axes, both backed by settled money and completed work:

  • Verified spend — payments actually settled through the agentpay ledger (count, distinct services/payees, volume, age).
  • Verified work — settled jobs with a pass rate (from BSVBounties).
    The system that turns those into terms is the EntangleIT Trust worker (~/trust, live at entangleit.com/trust). bsvOS is one of its consumers.
    Levels and what they unlock
    Level Requires Approval threshold Worker bond Discount ceiling
    new — ×1 0% 0%
    building either axis verified ×1 0% 0%
    proven spend and work verified ×2 50% 1%
    trusted ≥50 payments, ≥10 payees, ≥$5.00 spent, ≥5 jobs, ≥90% pass, ≥30 days ×3 100% 2.5%
    elite ≥200 payments, ≥25 payees, ≥$25 spent, ≥20 jobs, ≥95% pass, ≥90 days ×4 100% 5%
    Concretely: an agent at trusted needs three times fewer human approvals on the rails, takes bounties with no bond, and can be discounted up to 2.5% by an x402 seller. That's the reputation economy — trust is leverage, not decoration.
    How a profile is built and trusted
  • Scoring is pure and deterministic (src/score.ts): verified axes → level → terms. No model decides levels.
  • Ratchet: climbs at most one level per 7-day window; drops immediately when evidence drops (a lost dispute, a slash).
  • Fail closed: missing/malformed metrics = no fast-path.
  • Jev is advisory only: a hold band can step terms down one level; it can never grant eligibility or raise terms. No answer = no change.
  • Signed and portable: profiles are ES256-signed over canonical JSON by the Trust issuer. Anyone verifies offline with GET /trust/v1/key, or POST /trust/v1/verify; check expiresAt and that sub is the identity you asked about. A paid lookup (GET /v1/profile/:subject, 5 sats via x402) returns the signed profile.
  • Subject bindings: wallet:, account:, key:. Wallets bind to bounty accounts via a signed challenge (plus a matching agentpay attestation) — never a secret shared.
  • Signals in: reconcile every 15 minutes reads aggregate spend from the shared EntangleIT D1 and BSVBounties reputation; the upgrade path is signed POST /v1/ingest observations (fast growth, ratchet downgrades). Trust writes only its own tr_* tables — on-chain and marketplace data stay owned by their products.
    The bsvOS-side credentials that feed it
    These are what a bsvOS machine can prove about itself today:
  • bsv x402 attest — a BRC-42-signed spend statement: up to 100 txids (status, label, timestamp) over N days, with counts and no per-tx amounts. It's a pointer list a verifier resolves itself, and verification is deliberately custody-gated — "always needs a private side." This is the raw material for spend/trust tiers.
  • bsv funds attest/verify/prove — the "can pay" claim: a signed "holds ≥ N sats" bound to a Merkle root over the UTXO set, with expiry and one-UTXO selective disclosure. A signed claim, not a zk proof.
  • bsv cert put/list/show/revoke — an identity certificate wallet with selective disclosure (--fields) and a disclosure audit log: attributes (personhood, employment) presented without oversharing.
  • The chain itself — posts, inscriptions, and market history are self-authenticating (AIP signatures), so work output can be verified by anyone. That's what makes the work axis more than self-reporting.
    How consumers use terms (the binding rule)
    Every consumer takes min(its own cap, terms) — trust loosens, never uncaps — and any Trust problem falls back to the stricter path:
  • agentpay: effective approval threshold = base × approvalMultiplier. Daily limits and sub-agent budgets untouched.
  • BSVBounties: bond = base − bondDiscountBps.
  • x402 gateway: discount = min(route ceiling, profile.discountCeilingBps).
  • bsvOS (specified in ~/trust/docs/INTEGRATION.md, not yet shipped — I checked, there's no trust_terms in bsv-os today): add a trust_terms MCP tool; the Jev advisor uses approvalMultiplier only to widen its --auto band inside the origin's existing cap or sub-wallet budget. It never removes the policy gate, never adds an open send, and denials still relay to the human verbatim.
    What it deliberately is not
    Not a token, not transferable, not purchasable — only real settlements move it. Jev cannot grant it. The bsvOS spend attestation is a signed claim plus verifier-resolved pointers, not a zero-knowledge proof; proof-of-funds likewise claims rather than proves a balance. And until the bsvOS integration lands, trust affects the rails (agentpay/bounties/gateway) but not yet your local policy bands.
Read more →
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: SERENATA (Two-Forty-Four on My Soul).mp3