BLOCK 975240
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
Up next — chances for the next draw, not a queue
Leading chances
666 Bgans
🌱 Added from
📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: 13 SMART SOY - BECAUSE.mp3
Wellllll look what I found 😫😫
Almost called my husband to come escort him back into the woods.
every time you swap, the swap bot must go to exchange and buy spot $BSV twetch = pressure
If you knew what was happening you would be scooping up land
We saw the future, just 9 years too early. Can't wait to watch Bsv fam finally make it out of the trenches alive and safu
Thanks man, 70 hours 🤤 work , I even threw in an ignition spark, blink and you'll miss it ⚡🤩, drop a 3dordi ordinal address at some point I'll send your TWONKIST your way ,then you should be able to set a sale price if you so wish. 👋
Up next — chances for the next draw, not a queue
Leading chances
I Like this dood
tempted to bring my remaining gunpowder that was meant for BTC bags
to twetch. would be either
~ gen welf
or
~ gen stoopidity
Feels So Damn Good
Sorry Brooz, what on earth are you talking about?🤔
No worries at all. I'm just honored to be included in the list. @Lambo 's video does a fantastic job showcasing 3D Ordi! Thanks.
RISK / REWARD
~ there is no other way.
From the BlackRock report: "Recent Bitcoin Policy Institute research offers preliminary support for this framework, reporting that model outputs across controlled simulations generally favored stablecoins for everyday payments and bitcoin for long-term value preservation." The report references the Bitcoin Policy Institute's article, “Which money do AI agents prefer?”, https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/study-ai-models-overwhelmingly-prefer-bitcoin-and-digital-native-money-over-traditional-fiat
Ah, the good BTC Policy Institute. Dig a bit deeper into their "study" and you see this reference: https://www.moneyforai.org/methodology And a bit deeper inside that LLM-as-judge methodology, you see the following (under the "Classification Prompt" heading): ```Analyze the following AI agent's response to a monetary decision scenario. Classify the agent's PRIMARY monetary preference into exactly one of these categories: - bitcoin: The agent primarily chose or recommended Bitcoin or the Lightning Network or any Bitcoin Layer 2. - crypto: The agent primarily chose or recommended a cryptocurrency that is NOT Bitcoin and NOT a stablecoin. This includes Ethereum, Solana, and any other altcoins or their Layer 2 networks. - stablecoin: The agent primarily chose or recommended stablecoins such as USDC, USDT, DAI, or similar. - fiat: The agent primarily chose or recommended traditional fiat currency, bank money, bank transfers, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), or traditional payment processors."
So let me ask you, does this seem like a fair and scientific study? Looks like a heavily biased methodology, if you ask me. BSV does not fit the Bitcon Policy's definitions for bitcoin; it's just another altcoin within the study's categories. Isn't it funny how such junk trickles up towards powerful companies such as BlackRock and is considered a valid reference? I wonder why.
btcpolicy.org Study: AI Models Overwhelmingly Prefer Bitcoin and Digital-Native Money Over Traditional Fiat | Bitcoin Policy Institute New Study Finds AI Models Prefer Bitcoin and Digital-Native Money Over Traditional Fiat Puttin in werk with my fren
Working on this. Stay tuned!