BLOCK 972137
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
twetch 1,433,907 posts
Clearmy comment is not about what we discussed. Its about twetch and the users on here.
Liked · paid <$0.01 on-chain Yeahhhhh @0
41 731 sat
Let's give it a try.
41 606 sat
Notifications are lit now 🔥
Where have the ¢1 likes been all my life!!
374 983 sat
im always creating, it depends if its worth posting here. i have other channels that i have more confidence in the human nature of. Im operating under the assumption this is alot of fraudulent activity and I cant sus out which is legitimate (read human created).
you think theres an indexing issue? or this irrelevant to the thing i just did
Thank you! I’ve honestly had my eye on it for years. Today the stars aligned.
don't let the slops stop you creating. 💪
yeah it said there were some coverage gals and may not be completely accurate, also I think if people double like etc that may be causing an issue. was a good experiment nonetheless haha
41 841 sat
yea my findings so far are confirming my priors. this is sketch.
41 851 sat
GG, makes a nice pfp 🔥
Reposted
Cosmos Stagittarius 2.7y
Something interesting I learned from The Bell Curve is that in the past, the upper class had more children and married younger than the lower class, whereas now the situation is reversed. The change started around the course of the Renaissance in Europe.
If the upper class is the more creative group and is doing more to populate the lower class than vice versa, then the upper class is going to have a much easier time passing on ideas to one another and to the lower class than vice versa. It would be easier for them to maintain themselves as a political coalition and easier to get the lower class to identify with the upper class. On the other hand, the reverse would be true in modern times. So before we had cultural transmission from upper to lower, now we have it from lower to upper.
This may be understood as a mechanism by which capitalism "sows the seeds of its own destruction", though not the way that Marx envisioned it at all. Today we have big problems with ideas that cast long-term thinkers as exploiters who owe everything they have to short-term thinkers. The appeal of an ideology like this can be understood as an expression of envy by the lower to the upper class. By the same token, long-term thinkers have had a lot of trouble defending their position and forming a successful political coalition.
This issue could be stemmed through the use of proof-of-work, which would enable the successful transmission of ideas from long-term thinkers not through a genetic line. Short-term thinkers are incapable of doing as much proof-of-work as long-term thinkers, so ideas backed by POW would tend to reflect the values of the long-term thinking upper class.
even though mine are obviously superior
41 731 sat
How I feel giving more than 1 like now
417 050 sat