A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin

Two platforms, two promises.
On X, you post into an ocean. Millions of people could see your words, and visibility is the reward: followers, reputation, sometimes opportunities. On Treechat, you post into a room. The room is small, but every like, reply, and tip carries real value in micropayments. You don't just get noticed. You get paid.
On paper, Treechat sounds like the fairer deal. In practice, many users drift away feeling less successful than they did on X. Why?
One side: the micropayment model is broken for most users.
A small audience means few people see your post at all. And of the few who do, most don't tip. The result is a feedback loop that's hard to live with. On X, 40 views on a post feels like background noise. You can blame the algorithm, the timing, the mood of the day. On Treechat, zero earnings feels like a verdict. Putting a price on attention makes the absence of reward measurable, and measurable rejection hurts more than invisible rejection.
There's a second problem. In a small network, the same circle of users often tips each other. Money circulates among regulars, and it starts to reward belonging more than content. A newcomer looks at this and sees a closed economy. They post, they wait, nothing happens, and they quietly go back to the ocean, where at least there's a chance someone new is listening.
On this view, micropayments only work at scale. Without a large audience, paying for content just highlights how few people are paying.
The other side: Treechat users are measuring success with the wrong ruler.
Visibility on X is cheap. A like costs nothing and often means nothing: a thumb scrolling past, a reflex. Most of X's "reach" is attention that never turns into anything real. And despite the promise of scale, most X users are also shouting into silence. They just don't have a number that proves it.
On Treechat, every interaction costs the reader something, however small. That makes each one a genuine signal. One stranger who pays even a few cents for your words has told you more about the value of your work than a hundred reflexive likes. A small audience that pays may be worth more than a big audience that scrolls.
And the "closed circle" problem cuts both ways. Small communities reward consistency, and the people who stay, show up, and engage tend to find their place. Mass platforms reward virality, which is more like a lottery. On this view, Treechat isn't failing its users. It's asking them to stop expecting X-style numbers and start valuing smaller but more honest ones.
The question:
Would you rather be seen by thousands and valued by no one, or seen by twenty and paid by two? And if micropayments only feel rewarding at scale, can a small platform ever grow big enough for them to work?
Give your reason, not just your side.

《我的童年》9
（原写作于2012年9月，bsv链上公开连载）

家族
 
我的家族在几代以前在当地是大地主，爷爷的爷爷曾是镇长，富甲一方，镇上的很多土地都归我们家族所有。因为有其他家族嫉妒，所以我那即将走马上任县长的祖先被暗杀了，后来抓到真凶，凶手被拉到我的县长祖先坟前活祭。
 
有族谱记载祖上是湖广填四川时期到的四川，祖籍为江西，我们的大家族由此兴旺发达。到我爷爷这一系，爷爷仍是大地主，连乡镇的名字都以我们家的姓命名。爷爷和奶奶原先住的地方并不是我们现在住的地方，因为爷爷年轻时好赌，常把收的土地租金在回家的路上在镇上就输光了；奶奶于是决定搬家，将家搬到了离自己的田地比较近的地方，这样收的租金爷爷就没法拿到镇上去赌了。
    
奶奶年轻时非常漂亮，喜好读书，还喜欢运动某种球类，有点像现在的足球，但又不是。奶奶的头发很茂密，硬朗而又舒卷，即使在她年老后。小时侯我很喜欢奶奶，觉得她美丽善良，她也非常喜欢我，我是她的长孙，她会专门为我在路边采摘某种美丽的野果，那野果非常好吃。
 
年老后，奶奶开始学习基督教，总拿着本《圣经》到村里的一个地方和其他老人一起学习。我曾问过奶奶，你为什么要看《圣经》，她只回答，大家在一起学习好耍。奶奶的那本《圣经》我至今保存。在我上高中后，奶奶期待着我考上大学。奶奶说，爷爷那辈的几个兄弟姐妹都通过读书到城里去生活了，我们家族都喜欢读书人。很遗憾，奶奶在我考上大学后不久就去世了，母亲说，奶奶这么喜欢我，但并没享到我的福。
 
因为爷爷和奶奶是大地主的关系，后来我的父亲和四叔不能上高中，幺爸是因为后来政策改变了才上了高中。我的父亲和他的几个兄弟由此在小时侯就成为其他佃户的监督对象，那些佃户已经“翻身做主”。我的父亲和他的其他几个兄弟都具有沉默的特质，或许是因为这些历史的缘故吧。父亲在三十岁时娶了我的母亲，母亲是贫下中农出生，他们由此开始白手起家，艰苦创业。一年后，有了我。