BLOCK 972132

A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin

Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.

Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.

treechat 243,685 posts

Clear
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

maxXx listed an ordinal · 200,000,000 sats

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

Cryptoboy listed an ordinal · 100,000,000 sats

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat
Replying to@14aqJ2…oWGK

Up next — chances for the next draw, not a queue
Leading chances

  1. The Dustrunner.mp3 — 11.54% chance
  2. SMART SOY - REACH OUT.mp3 — 8.53% chance
  3. Chronicles of Chronicle.mp3 — 6.95% chance
  4. Survivors in the Danger Zone.mp3 — 6.0% chance
  5. MC Binary Barz 2.0.mp3 — 5.71% chance
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: Crank The Signal.mp3

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

🌱 Added from

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat
Replying to@14aqJ2…oWGK

One more thing, BTC transactions also occur off-chain on Lightning so to say it has no transaction volume and is worthless is misleading and incorrect.

You could make an argument that off-chain transactions cannot be verified which could be important. Trump supposedly paid for a Burger with Lightning, if that purchase needed to be confirmed, perhaps to confirm his location at the time that could be a problem.

An argument could also be made for most users holding accounts with large financial companies in order to make those off-chain Lightning payments.

The conversation about users converting from BTC mainchain to off-chain and then back on-chain is relevant, if on-chain transaction fees eventually rise to somewhat replace mining reward subsidy the ability for people to move money on and off Lightning at all could be impractical or simply too expensive to do.

To rattle off the same thing without adding important information or context is tiresome, misleading and probably detrimental to BSV

Read more →
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

📻 Now playing on Treechat Radio: Space Cats v2 - Nyadada-Mastered-File.wav

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X

@MemeWaveApp:
I don't think BSVA will do anything like that. Besides, maybe exchanges will refuse to list it (remember, they de-listed it in the first place).
Would be better if someone can wrap BSV on Solana and let it trade on DEXes, then potentially creating enough volume so that major

🔗 https://x.com/MemeWaveApp/status/2105011337034399809

MemeWave @MemeWaveApp I don't think BSVA will do anything like that. Besides, maybe exchanges will refuse to list it (remember, they de-listed it in the first place). Would be better if someone can wrap BSV on Solana and let it trade on DEXes, then potentially creating enough volume so that major…
14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

When you realize there is no limit to what you can absorb

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

REACH OUT
[[Chuck Tone]] [[listento]] [[bass music]] 2026

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

"Turbulence"
Early Krea Animation in 2024

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

Windows

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

Gaze upon the endless march of time

14aqJ2…oWGK Custodial · treechat

🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X

@Guillaume88745:
“There is no such thing as consensus on BSV” Then how do nodes agree on valid blocks and transactions? Governance doesn’t magically eliminate protocol consensus. You’re still dodging the question: show where NAR compliance is a block-validation rule.

🔗 https://x.com/Guillaume88745/status/2104997385877287089

Mr. Freeze @Guillaume88745 “There is no such thing as consensus on BSV” 😂 Then how do nodes agree on valid blocks and transactions? Governance doesn’t magically eliminate protocol consensus. You’re still dodging the question: show where NAR compliance is a block-validation rule.