🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@MoonCoinRising:
Check out this article. I think it explains very well the exceptional position that BSV holds amongst all the various Bitcoin Forks:
BLOCK 972875
A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin
Every post signed. Every block a heartbeat.
Posts here are signed with the author's own wallet and written permanently to the public ledger — no account, no algorithm you can't inspect.
treechat 249,669 posts
Clear10. 🔴 "Some are cursed by the devil and downright evil"
Not a factual/technical claim — this is a theological/moral opinion presented as if it's a factual property of tokens. Technically, tokens are code. They can be used for fraud or harm, but the language of "cursed by the devil" is opinion, not fact.
9. 🔴 The Bible quote: "man cannot live on bread alone but on every word of God"
Slightly misapplied. This is from Matthew 4:4 / Deuteronomy 8:3 and is used here to support the idea that water is more valuable than soft drink. The quote is about spiritual nourishment, not physical water vs soft drink. It's not an error per se, but a misapplication of scripture to a physical/commercial argument.
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@BSVCasey:
Marvellous!
And yet, BSV is 10-20% more profitable to mine?
You really do lack critical understanding.
Your clock's batteries are about to run out, and the manufacturers don't make them anymore!
Good luck
8. 🔴 "Venezuelan equivalent to a dollar bill at peak hyperinflation"
Slightly misleading. Venezuela's hyperinflation peaked around 2018-2019 at ~10 million % annually. The author uses this correctly as a metaphor for worthlessness, but says "smallest note" — at peak hyperinflation Venezuela's smallest notes were worth fractions of a US cent, not a dollar equivalent. Minor factual imprecision.
🔎 The latest selection regarding BSV on X
@QuestDima:
It doesn't require markets. All it needs is an easy way in and out. I send $100, i get roughly $99 worth of bsv. Same way back. That's how Coinbase started.
That's all what'sneeded. RockWallet is somewhat like that, but they have their own issues
7. 🔴 "Tokens on an eighties video game"
Historically inaccurate. NFT-style tokens did not exist in the 1980s in any form. Blockchain wasn't invented until Bitcoin's whitepaper in 2008. This is a metaphor but could mislead someone into thinking early video game tokens were related to NFTs.
Love the green contrast!
6. 🔴 "One token worth less than a cent has that much capability to activate end of humanity"
False / extreme exaggeration. A single NFT token cannot trigger the end of humanity. This is hyperbole presented in a way that could be taken literally and is factually baseless.
5. 🔴 "Turing complete" explanation is muddled
Partially correct but misleading. Turing completeness applies to smart contract platforms (like Ethereum), NOT to individual NFTs themselves. An NFT is a token standard (e.g. ERC-721). The blockchain or smart contract running it may be Turing complete. Saying a single NFT is "Turing complete" is technically incorrect — the platform is Turing complete, not the token.
4. 🔴 "When they are all the same they are fungible"
This is wrong in context. If tokens of the same type are all identical, they are fungible by definition — they are NOT NFTs at that point. You cannot have a "non-fungible token" that is also "millions all the same." That's a contradiction in terms. The author seems confused here.
3. 🔴 "Some can give you access to 1 million books"
Misleading/Unverified. While NFTs can be used as access tokens, no standard NFT gives access to 1 million books. This is a speculative exaggeration presented as fact.