A sovereign social network
powered by Bitcoin

Certainly, had it been capable of moderation, it is to be believed that in the sack and desolation of Thebes, to see so many valiant men, lost and totally destitute of any further defence, cruelly massacred before his eyes, would have appeased it: where there were above six thousand put to the sword, of whom not one was seen to fly, or heard to cry out for quarter; but, on the contrary, every one running here and there to seek out and to provoke the victorious enemy to help them to an honourable end. Not one was seen who, however weakened with wounds, did not in his last gasp yet endeavour to revenge himself, and with all the arms of a brave despair, to sweeten his own death in the death of an enemy. Yet did their valour create no pity, and the length of one day was not enough to satiate the thirst of the conqueror’s revenge, but the slaughter continued to the last drop of blood that was capable of being shed, and stopped not till it met with none but unarmed persons, old men, women, and children, of them to carry away to the number of thirty thousand slaves.

I am speaking, as before, of injustice on a large scale in which the advantage of the unjust is most apparent; and my meaning will be most clearly seen if we turn to that highest form of injustice in which the criminal is the happiest of men, and the sufferers or those who refuse to do injustice are the most miserable—that is to say tyranny, which by fraud and force takes away the property of others, not little by little but wholesale; comprehending in one, things sacred as well as profane, private and public; for which acts of wrong, if he were detected perpetrating any one of them singly, he would be punished and incur great disgrace—they who do such wrong in particular cases are called robbers of temples, and man-stealers and burglars and swindlers and thieves. But when a man besides taking away the money of the citizens has made slaves of them, then, instead of these names of reproach, he is termed happy and blessed, not only by the citizens but by all who hear of his having achieved the consummation of injustice. For mankind censure injustice, fearing that they may be the victims of it and not because they shrink from committing it. And thus, as I have shown, Socrates, injustice, when on a sufficient scale, has more strength and freedom and mastery than justice; and, as I said at first, justice is the interest of the stronger, whereas injustice is a man’s own profit and interest.

Duke Filippo being dead, the Milanese enlisted Francesco Sforza against the Venetians, and he, having overcome the enemy at Caravaggio,[2] allied himself with them to crush the Milanese, his masters. His father, Sforza, having been engaged by Queen Johanna[3] of Naples, left her unprotected, so that she was forced to throw herself into the arms of the King of Aragon, in order to save her kingdom. And if the Venetians and Florentines formerly extended their dominions by these arms, and yet their captains did not make themselves princes, but have defended them, I reply that the Florentines in this case have been favoured by chance, for of the able captains, of whom they might have stood in fear, some have not conquered, some have been opposed, and others have turned their ambitions elsewhere. One who did not conquer was Giovanni Acuto,[4] and since he did not conquer his fidelity cannot be proved; but every one will acknowledge that, had he conquered, the Florentines would have stood at his discretion. Sforza had the Bracceschi always against him, so they watched each other. Francesco turned his ambition to Lombardy; Braccio against the Church and the kingdom of Naples. But let us come to that which happened a short while ago. The Florentines appointed as their captain Pagolo Vitelli, a most prudent man, who from a private position had risen to the greatest renown. If this man had taken Pisa, nobody can deny that it would have been proper for the Florentines to keep in with him, for if he became the soldier of their enemies they had no means of resisting, and if they held to him they must obey him. The Venetians, if their achievements are considered, will be seen to have acted safely and gloriously so long as they sent to war their own men, when with armed gentlemen and plebians they did valiantly. This was before they turned to enterprises on land, but when they began to fight on land they forsook this virtue and followed the custom of Italy.

Duke Filippo being dead, the Milanese enlisted Francesco Sforza against the Venetians, and he, having overcome the enemy at Caravaggio,[2] allied himself with them to crush the Milanese, his masters. His father, Sforza, having been engaged by Queen Johanna[3] of Naples, left her unprotected, so that she was forced to throw herself into the arms of the King of Aragon, in order to save her kingdom. And if the Venetians and Florentines formerly extended their dominions by these arms, and yet their captains did not make themselves princes, but have defended them, I reply that the Florentines in this case have been favoured by chance, for of the able captains, of whom they might have stood in fear, some have not conquered, some have been opposed, and others have turned their ambitions elsewhere. One who did not conquer was Giovanni Acuto,[4] and since he did not conquer his fidelity cannot be proved; but every one will acknowledge that, had he conquered, the Florentines would have stood at his discretion. Sforza had the Bracceschi always against him, so they watched each other. Francesco turned his ambition to Lombardy; Braccio against the Church and the kingdom of Naples. But let us come to that which happened a short while ago. The Florentines appointed as their captain Pagolo Vitelli, a most prudent man, who from a private position had risen to the greatest renown. If this man had taken Pisa, nobody can deny that it would have been proper for the Florentines to keep in with him, for if he became the soldier of their enemies they had no means of resisting, and if they held to him they must obey him. The Venetians, if their achievements are considered, will be seen to have acted safely and gloriously so long as they sent to war their own men, when with armed gentlemen and plebians they did valiantly. This was before they turned to enterprises on land, but when they began to fight on land they forsook this virtue and followed the custom of Italy.

Aeschylus: Prometheus Bound. Tr. E. B. Browning. (LLA 24) .40 *Alembert, d’: Introduction to the Encyclopédie of 1751. Tr. T. D. Lockwood. (LLA 88) .80 *Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Tr. M. Ostwald. (LLA 75) .80 ——: On the Art of Poetry. Tr. S. H. Butcher. (LLA 6) .50 *——: On Poetry and Style. Tr. G. M. A. Grube. (LLA 68) .75 Augustine: On Christian Doctrine. Tr. D. W. Robertson, Jr. (LLA 80) .95 *Bacon: The New Organon. (LLA 97) 1.00 *Beccaria: Of Crimes and Punishments. Tr. H. Paolucci & V. Caporale. (LLA 107) .60 Bergson: An Introduction to Metaphysics. Tr. T. E. Hulme. (LLA 10) .40 *Berkeley: An Essay Toward a New Theory of Vision & The Theory of Vision Vindicated. (LLA 83) .80 ——: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. (LLA 53) .75 ——: Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. (LLA 39) .75 Boccaccio on Poetry. Tr. C. G. Osgood. (LLA 82) cl. $3.50 1.25 *Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy. Tr. R. H. Green. (LLA 86) .95 Bonaventura: The Mind’s Road to God. Tr. G. Boas. (LLA 32) .50 Bowman: The Absurdity of Christianity and Other Essays. (LLA 56) .75 Bradley: Ethical Studies (Selected Essays). (LLA 28) cl. $2.00 .85 *Burke: On the Sublime and Beautiful. (LLA 99) .90 ——: Reflections on the Revolution in France. (LLA 46) cl. $3.50 1.25 Butler: Five Sermons. (LLA 21) .60 Calvin: On the Christian Faith. (LLA 93) .95 ——: On God and Political Duty. (LLA 23) .60 *The Cid. Tr. J. G. Markley. (LLA 77) .75 Cornford: Plato and Parmenides. (LLA 102) 1.60 ——: Plato’s Cosmology. (LLA 101) 1.75 ——: Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. (LLA 100) 1.75 *Dante: De vulgari eloquentia. Tr. W. T. H. Jackson. (LLA 85) .60 ——: On World-Government (De Monarchia). Tr. H. W. Schneider. (LLA 15) .60 Descartes: Discourse on Method. Tr. L. J. Lafleur. (LLA 19) .50 *——: Discourse on Method and Meditations. Tr. L. J. Lafleur. (LLA 89) .90 ——: Meditations. Tr. L. J. Lafleur.