Phil recently tweeted griping CSW didn't understand the system .
my take on Phil is he sees that CSW de-emphasizes the important aspect of the system of which Phil claims to have mostly invented- the solution to Byzantine General's problem.
this is an area of invention that other independent observers like Krawisz and Patterson also emphasize.
Phil views he created a system with broad theoretical applicability of the trust model, which is rooted in signalling
phil in current days is under the hood messing around reapplications of mining theory.
csw looks outside-in. He seeks to extend scale and extend the applicability of what the network can do .
More 1+1 = whole
just opinions