Post by 1DLCGe…wkbY

Most likely just people paying you in the hopes you can help pump their bags with your reach lmao

True. Not everyone is happy about that. Time will tell how that plays out.

But on-chain is still on-chain.

What is the big deal. If you are enterprise and get hacked and have no way to get your property back would you adopt? It's also childish to believe that you can live outside of law, as if because you had this exterior medium of exchange that you could put government in it's place. You resolve almost everything in dollars so how can you have this work outside of law? You want better law it's going to take a lot more than picking a coin. The thing that scares you most is precisely the thing that you will end up with. DAR or no DAR. "I'm worried about govt seizing my coins, but if it's stolen it's fair game".

Also, why do you need to redo proof of work? It's an amendment to the historical record. You can see here it was stolen and then returned. System remains intact

IMHO if you're against having stolen bitcoins returned, you haven't got nearly enough bitcoins...

🤣🤣😂

My understanding of the court ordered utxo re-assignment is there would still be a record of the seizure. The spend would still be on-chain in a new transaction

Will certainly be entertaining the first time it gets used

It will still be onchain, even if there were a court ordered seizure, it would all be recorded on chain forever. Don't get things twisted.

And yet the bitcoin ASSociation couldn't help me get back $6,000 of my stolen BSV. Tried every avenue and was told the starting cost to recover for lawyers and court was $3500. and my small amount was not worth recovering.