when the mint is captured by design, its good if you can be whitelisted then mint, its free money based on circulating art, no known creator and some dont even have twetch branded edits like you kind of mentioned, you just upload and cash in. Selling the central ownership makes the premium to participate in the library or earn even as an early user insane, Ill stick to other twonks, it sucks these are sucking liquidity out of the market but I personally wont buy any, cool in concept with ways to make it work, but think the dank memes just got rendered extremely jewish
Post by Brooz ☕️
they could have just minted apu foxes. instead they went for a quick money grab.
but as @52293 and I were talmbout; if the memes were twetch exclusive (I.e @365 @4662 @1959 or any other ults) then id understand a bit more
549 264 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 869
- Time
- 2026-08-11T15:42:53Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (17)
Obvious derivatives of other peoples/agencies copyrighted content are not "Twetch exclusive" bro
well you claim copyright infringement - that applies to literally half of the nfts on eth btc and sol so I dont think anyone really cares about copyright lol
let me rephrase an earlier comment - i dont think any meme should be monetise.
the idea of a meme is fun or just to be silly
Exactly, this to me goes against the spirit of the internet.
I'm not "claiming" copyright infringement, it's objectively happening and fully exposes the website and even users to legal trouble from many different actors already, and there's a full public audit trail making it an open and shut case.
Not to mention selling other people's work/likeness unauthorized is shady as fuck and greedy as fuck.
i think monetization CAN be fun, and silly too, if it is microtransactions then especially! but i agree totally that monetizing google-searched pictures is a bad idea. should really just be original art or derived from memes that have no copyright
273 317 sat