I'm not "claiming" copyright infringement, it's objectively happening and fully exposes the website and even users to legal trouble from many different actors already, and there's a full public audit trail making it an open and shut case.
Not to mention selling other people's work/likeness unauthorized is shady as fuck and greedy as fuck.
i think monetization CAN be fun, and silly too, if it is microtransactions then especially! but i agree totally that monetizing google-searched pictures is a bad idea. should really just be original art or derived from memes that have no copyright
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE UnverifiedI agree it's a good and fun idea if it's original content, legal.
LOL Apu Apustaja 📈
should really be called apu anomuumi
Retarded finnish frog 💚
One poster on the imageboard used to make threads about what his "ruoka-apu apustaja" (basically a home health aide who brought them groceries) gave him to eat that week. It evolved into apu posting, the frog is that tard who needed home aid.
are y'all retards in finland or just the home help blogger, you, and @328