Obvious derivatives of other peoples/agencies copyrighted content are not "Twetch exclusive" bro
Post by Brooz ☕️
well you claim copyright infringement - that applies to literally half of the nfts on eth btc and sol so I dont think anyone really cares about copyright lol
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 871
- Time
- 2026-08-11T15:49:13Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (15)
let me rephrase an earlier comment - i dont think any meme should be monetise.
the idea of a meme is fun or just to be silly
Exactly, this to me goes against the spirit of the internet.
Memes are like the one pure thing left on the internet.
the bros got the extractor factory redlining
546 636 sat
I'm not "claiming" copyright infringement, it's objectively happening and fully exposes the website and even users to legal trouble from many different actors already, and there's a full public audit trail making it an open and shut case.
Not to mention selling other people's work/likeness unauthorized is shady as fuck and greedy as fuck.
i think monetization CAN be fun, and silly too, if it is microtransactions then especially! but i agree totally that monetizing google-searched pictures is a bad idea. should really just be original art or derived from memes that have no copyright
273 317 sat
I agree it's a good and fun idea if it's original content, legal.
LOL Apu Apustaja 📈
549 168 sat