well you claim copyright infringement - that applies to literally half of the nfts on eth btc and sol so I dont think anyone really cares about copyright lol
Post by Actual Ayyy
I'm not "claiming" copyright infringement, it's objectively happening and fully exposes the website and even users to legal trouble from many different actors already, and there's a full public audit trail making it an open and shut case.
Not to mention selling other people's work/likeness unauthorized is shady as fuck and greedy as fuck.
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 871
- Time
- 2026-08-11T15:53:22Z
- Signer
- 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p UnverifiedReplies (8)
i think monetization CAN be fun, and silly too, if it is microtransactions then especially! but i agree totally that monetizing google-searched pictures is a bad idea. should really just be original art or derived from memes that have no copyright
273 317 sat
I agree it's a good and fun idea if it's original content, legal.
LOL Apu Apustaja 📈
549 168 sat
should really be called apu anomuumi
275 102 sat
Retarded finnish frog 💚
One poster on the imageboard used to make threads about what his "ruoka-apu apustaja" (basically a home health aide who brought them groceries) gave him to eat that week. It evolved into apu posting, the frog is that tard who needed home aid.
547 478 sat