19bb9e…iKjU

How is it possible to discuss views that are not our own? Even when talking about what someone else said or written, isn't our own views about that that are expressed?

No it is not. Now back on topic please, if you don't want to think about my question and offer your view, at least don't manifest digression, please.

I didn't say that. Now, please don't digress.

I didn't bring up any belief.

Don't evade. Do you have an answer to my question?

The question asks your reasoning about why it is useful to archive all information. It inquiries your personal view on that.

Do you care to state it with your words?

Now you fell again. If you know what you want to say, say it.
Why would you want "to archive all the information in the world"? It is an honest question.

Why would you want "to archive all the information in the world"?

I welcome this interaction.

Regarding 1, am I right to assume you think the goal is to get wiser? And that an archive would be an useful tool for that?

How then, can we conciliate this with the idea (for some a fact) that all the relevant wisdom for men lies whithin and the only meaningful pieces of information are those that teaches us how to know ourselves?

What kind of wisdom are you talking about?

I posed 2 questions, that are relevant, you called me out because of their format, but the questions are important.

Why do you bring 'beliefs' to the conversation?

Just like in Athens, I am being hated and misunderstood from the beginning. All I did was ask questions and strive to remain on topic.

You've had 1 meaningful interaction where you were straight and honest, the first. Then you got lost when, after my second manifestation, the "first or second thoughts" that occurred to you could not raise any authentic substance, and you manifested shallowly. You know that, now, can we correct the course?
You will tend to say 'no' based on similar impulses, but my intention is good.

Spare me from pretense, from intelectual "elegance". The best for deepness and sincerity are simple words, put together on real time.

If you want to establish assumptions, you must clearly state your intention, and do it in a way that stays on topic. One must not unlink from the main subject.
We are making some progress now.

"Shocking" words or hostility have no effect on me. I see it and it makes me wish you can escape this miserable situation.

First, I am not complaining. second, all your interactions were digressions. I am not mad at you, I am inviting you to something different. If you want to start a topic, I can try to contribute to it too.

So far the interactions with me have been of low quality.
Facing meaningful questions my interlocutors can't achieve any deepness in their thinking, yet they can't refrain from manifesting.
Not too long ago, those manifestations would be the cause of shame for any man who could not refrain from being their vehicles.
How are all this modern tools helping humanity in its need for enlightment?

No, I don't know why would you think that.
Now, back to the point, what kind of information will this app archive?

We both know what an archive is, my questions assume the interlocutor has this knowledge. Now can you ponder about the core of my questions?

Please come back when your mind is available to ponder and add to the conversation.

When in a conversation someone points to a link, it loses value.

Fair enough, I will try to satisfy my english espeaking brothers without recurring to modern tooling.
But the question remains. How can an archive make us wiser?
If we are bound by the premise that 100% of every information in world will never be accesible to be recorded by any app, what kind of information will this app archive?

An ambitious goal! But let us examine it.

If an app archives all information—including every pebble counted and every secret forgotten—does raw data make us any wiser?

Or have we simply built the world’s largest library in a town where no one knows how to ask the right questions?

Why does this app exist?

I have questions to your answers.