You've had 1 meaningful interaction where you were straight and honest, the first. Then you got lost when, after my second manifestation, the "first or second thoughts" that occurred to you could not raise any authentic substance, and you manifested shallowly. You know that, now, can we correct the course?
You will tend to say 'no' based on similar impulses, but my intention is good.
Post by Admiral XYZ™
You continue to ignore my first interaction, which you acknowledge was "straight and honest".
Disagree with the rest of your points, but if you're so worried about "correcting course", you ought to reply to the "straight and honest" interaction in kind.
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 277
- Time
- 2026-08-07T16:30:17Z
- Signer
- 1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad UnverifiedReplies (20)
I posed 2 questions, that are relevant, you called me out because of their format, but the questions are important.
An archive doesn't make us wiser - what we do with the archive does.
All the information that can be put into the archive should be put into the archive.
Now, I see the following thoughts:
What are the limitations of the archive, such that we need to narrow "all possible information" to "less than all possible information"?
If "less than all information" is required, then a systematic filtering should be applied. High-level answers (categories, personal preferences) do us little good.
A better archiving system may be created in the future. Maybe even the near future.
Something that would render BSV not only obsolete, but destine the content on it to be almost completely forgotten and unseen.
Why wouldn't the superior archive absorb the inferior archive?
I welcome this interaction.
Regarding 1, am I right to assume you think the goal is to get wiser? And that an archive would be an useful tool for that?
How then, can we conciliate this with the idea (for some a fact) that all the relevant wisdom for men lies whithin and the only meaningful pieces of information are those that teaches us how to know ourselves?
What kind of wisdom are you talking about?
"all the relevant wisdom for men lies whithin and the only meaningful pieces of information are those that teaches us how to know ourselves"
This is an opinion, not a fact.
- I wouldn't say the goal is to get wiser. You are the one that inserted pursuit of wisdom into the conversation.
You asked the purpose of the site, and I replied "to archive all the information in the world" without regard to what is done with the information.
For someone who wants to keep the conversation on topic, you are certainly talking about "wisdom" quite a bit.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.