here are the "main subject" interactions so far
you continue to ask a question I have already answered - twice now
not sure where to go from here if you do not do something with the answer you have been given
Post by 19bb9e…iKjU
You've had 1 meaningful interaction where you were straight and honest, the first. Then you got lost when, after my second manifestation, the "first or second thoughts" that occurred to you could not raise any authentic substance, and you manifested shallowly. You know that, now, can we correct the course?
You will tend to say 'no' based on similar impulses, but my intention is good.
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 276
- Time
- 2026-08-07T16:09:15Z
- Signer
- 19bb9e2Rv8jZYzVeNXU7LqtH4EXmkjiKjU
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
19bb9e2Rv8jZYzVeNXU7LqtH4EXmkjiKjU UnverifiedReplies (19)
You continue to ignore my first interaction, which you acknowledge was "straight and honest".
Disagree with the rest of your points, but if you're so worried about "correcting course", you ought to reply to the "straight and honest" interaction in kind.
I posed 2 questions, that are relevant, you called me out because of their format, but the questions are important.
An archive doesn't make us wiser - what we do with the archive does.
All the information that can be put into the archive should be put into the archive.
Now, I see the following thoughts:
What are the limitations of the archive, such that we need to narrow "all possible information" to "less than all possible information"?
If "less than all information" is required, then a systematic filtering should be applied. High-level answers (categories, personal preferences) do us little good.
A better archiving system may be created in the future. Maybe even the near future.
Something that would render BSV not only obsolete, but destine the content on it to be almost completely forgotten and unseen.
I welcome this interaction.
Regarding 1, am I right to assume you think the goal is to get wiser? And that an archive would be an useful tool for that?
How then, can we conciliate this with the idea (for some a fact) that all the relevant wisdom for men lies whithin and the only meaningful pieces of information are those that teaches us how to know ourselves?
What kind of wisdom are you talking about?
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.