We have the ability to leave our phone at home.
Post by Actual Ayyy
Still probably doesn't matter these days.
I'm pretty confident flock cameras are just cover for the fact that they have way better surveillance than static cameras. Phone at home notwithstanding.
If they remove flock cameras due to public outcry, I'll consider it proof.
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 445
- Time
- 2026-08-22T18:18:02Z
- Signer
- 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p UnverifiedReplies (28)
Think about it this way @729
How many other cameras exist within the perimeter of visible flock cameras?
Ring doorbells? Businesses? Traffic cams? Etc?
They can already see everything bro. They don't need flock cameras to have access to the massive network of cameras that already exists.
My bet is they will remove flock cameras and everyone will cheer and go back to not realizing they're always being watched
234 329 sat
You’re not wrong about the pervasive cameras, they are already at intersections and in our phones but something about the Flock cameras feels more aggressive.
They know we are waking up to their corruption and they are clamping down on the police state while they still can. They know we are about to revolt.
I'm telling you bro it's cover for the fact that they already have the surveillance state. That is how they operate. They show you things to misdirect you.
"Look over here, these are the cameras that are watching you, just these ones - not all the other ones, not your phone!!"
A big part of contemporary tax-farming is about allowing different groups their little revolutionary fantasies.
Controlled "Chaos"
Gotta give all the different demographics their heat-sinks for revolutionary vibes
I do think that there is some value in removing the home town's authority in treating it's citizens like criminals.
Patriot Act has entered the chat.
I think the whole thing is a ruse. They never planned on allowing them to stay up. The entire thing is an operation to make people believe "Oh no, mass surveillance isn't already happening, look they're trying to start it with these obvious cameras they're telling us about!!! We need to stop them!!!"
Then they remove the cameras "due to public outcry", and again, everyone goes back to not realizing they're always being watched already.
So, hometown authority never actually had a chance in the first place (beyond the limited time these cameras will remain standing)
Greg Abbott blocks state agencies in Texas from spending money on flock.
The Texas Tribune Abbott blocks state agencies from spending money on Flock cameras The order came as The Texas Tribune was preparing to publish an investigation detailing how a state agency has devoted at least $30 million to building the state’s Flock surveillance network. 252 366 sat
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.