Being worried about flock cameras when you have a cell phone in your pocket all day and they have satellite surveillance and can see through walls
471 424 sat
Post by JSON
We have the ability to leave our phone at home.
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 445
- Time
- 2026-08-22T18:14:40Z
- Signer
- 184dvPfjnC6AXqVZGgVMGxhECYrWYfGa4u
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
184dvPfjnC6AXqVZGgVMGxhECYrWYfGa4u UnverifiedReplies (27)
Still probably doesn't matter these days.
I'm pretty confident flock cameras are just cover for the fact that they have way better surveillance than static cameras. Phone at home notwithstanding.
If they remove flock cameras due to public outcry, I'll consider it proof.
Think about it this way @729
How many other cameras exist within the perimeter of visible flock cameras?
Ring doorbells? Businesses? Traffic cams? Etc?
They can already see everything bro. They don't need flock cameras to have access to the massive network of cameras that already exists.
My bet is they will remove flock cameras and everyone will cheer and go back to not realizing they're always being watched
234 329 sat
You’re not wrong about the pervasive cameras, they are already at intersections and in our phones but something about the Flock cameras feels more aggressive.
They know we are waking up to their corruption and they are clamping down on the police state while they still can. They know we are about to revolt.
A big part of contemporary tax-farming is about allowing different groups their little revolutionary fantasies.
I do think that there is some value in removing the home town's authority in treating it's citizens like criminals.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.