Post by twetch#774

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch

get a glass

put some ice in it

fill it up with water and observe

the ice melting does not increase the water level

now go fuck yourself if you still think people need to get taxed more to ‘save the ice caps’

thanks

What the chain says
Block
618 835
Time
2020-01-23T06:47:58Z
Signer
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#774

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ Verified

Reposted by (1)

Replies (14)

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

H2O is responsible for more global warming than CO2, why can't we tax H2O emissions too? Then I'll be able to buy two beachside mansions.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

wow abrasively put, couldn’t have said it better 🙌

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

The argument that the ice mass is above water so when melting the water mass increases. But yes, I am with you here. There’s not enough ice to cause a REAL issue.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

Which new land are you referring to?

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

If snow melts off a mountain, ending up in the see and raising the water level, that mountain now has newly exposed useable land.

Continue thread →
1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

um i don't think the ice caps are floating like the case of cubes in water. pretty sure melting ice caps would raise sea level. but I don't wanna go there with you cause I agree with your sentiment

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

You don’t think? You shouldn’t think, you should know. I know a lot of it is and if it isn’t:

twetch#774 6.7y

In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

After reading your reply, I am now not actually sure what you are talking about. Either I am not smart enough or i am missing the context that spurred your first twetch.

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ
twetch#774 6.7y

In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.

1DvzH9…5fiq Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

I argued w/one recently who tried to make the point you just made while arguing in defense of a video which showed virtually nothing but sea ice freeze-melt cycle as evidence of rising sea levels.

They think they science, but they actually religion.