The argument that the ice mass is above water so when melting the water mass increases. But yes, I am with you here. There’s not enough ice to cause a REAL issue.
Post by twetch#774
In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.
What the chain says
- Block
- 619 859
- Time
- 2020-01-30T06:58:25Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#774
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (5)
Which new land are you referring to?
If snow melts off a mountain, ending up in the see and raising the water level, that mountain now has newly exposed useable land.
Sure, but, the artics are just ice and not land (allegedly)
I think the south pole is land underneath. lots of elevation too. anyway i don't understand the point of this convo so imma head out