In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.
Post by twetch#3667
Which new land are you referring to?
What the chain says
- Block
- 619 863
- Time
- 2020-01-30T12:08:55Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3667
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (4)
If snow melts off a mountain, ending up in the see and raising the water level, that mountain now has newly exposed useable land.
Sure, but, the artics are just ice and not land (allegedly)
I think the south pole is land underneath. lots of elevation too. anyway i don't understand the point of this convo so imma head out
Hahahahaha