get a glass
put some ice in it
fill it up with water and observe
the ice melting does not increase the water level
now go fuck yourself if you still think people need to get taxed more to ‘save the ice caps’
thanks
Post by twetch#3667
The argument that the ice mass is above water so when melting the water mass increases. But yes, I am with you here. There’s not enough ice to cause a REAL issue.
What the chain says
- Block
- 619 755
- Time
- 2020-01-29T16:12:59Z
- Signer
- 1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3667
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JLButMZPU7xu2PUBPxekTcpJKPzZuaTuZ VerifiedReplies (6)
In that case, nature is taking away landmass on one hand, while exposing new land on the other.
Which new land are you referring to?
If snow melts off a mountain, ending up in the see and raising the water level, that mountain now has newly exposed useable land.
Sure, but, the artics are just ice and not land (allegedly)