Just finished watching this. It was a great discussion, with only a few pieces I felt were missing that I could add to.
Those additions are linked in the following twetches in this thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qRMH_TO6Do&feature=emb_logo
Post by twetch#622
First, on the protocol being "set-in-stone":
twetch#622 6.6y
True or False?
BSV's user-side is set in stone.
As in, from now on, users don't need to care about whatever hard forks remain.
What's left is miners fixing things on their end, i.e. the difficulty adjustment algorithm.
What the chain says
- Block
- 625 651
- Time
- 2020-03-10T18:44:41Z
- Signer
- 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#622
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C VerifiedReplies (7)
Finally, on the issue of people following CSW down a bad path:
twetch#622 6.6y
In response to @4179's concern regarding people following Craig in ways that introduce bugs (huge paraphrase, I know... Hopefully folks get what I'm referring to if they've watched the video...)
(See next twetch in thread)
Thanks for the thoughtful commentary!
Thanks for the thoughtful (and charitable) commentary, @39.