Peck by twetch#622

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

In response to @4179's concern regarding people following Craig in ways that introduce bugs (huge paraphrase, I know... Hopefully folks get what I'm referring to if they've watched the video...)

(See next twetch in thread)

What the chain says

Transaction: 51ea9ae65d5d577f6081da63b4150f4031f40b0cf63169707aaa3ac90d599205
Block: 625 641
Time: 2020-03-10T17:44:41Z
Signer: 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#622

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C Verified

Replies (3)

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

So far, if people are blindly following CSW, it appears to me that such blind following has produced FAR less of such circumstances than in, say, BCH (checkpoints, devtax, etc.) or BTC (as if I need to give examples...)

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

In fact, I would even suggest that such blind following has produced moves away from "bugs" and "system breaking changes" such as P2SH, broken op codes, etc.

So... From a pragmatic standpoint, I don't see how your objection is consistent with reality.

twetch#622 6.6y

1Eyk15…d43C Key · twetch

Replying to@1Eyk15…d43C

It seems to contradict reality in that either:
A) People blindly following CSW is actually going pretty well so far, or
B) People aren't blindly following CSW as you fear.

Post by twetch#622

Replies (3)