Post by Admiral XYZ™

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

A better archiving system may be created in the future. Maybe even the near future.

Something that would render BSV not only obsolete, but destine the content on it to be almost completely forgotten and unseen.

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch

Why wouldn't the superior archive absorb the inferior archive?

What the chain says
Block
961 279
Time
2026-08-07T16:47:59Z
Signer
1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad Unverified

Replies (7)

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pqguf…CTad

I suppose it would, but why would people look for that content?

It would be like looking for content about Betamax. Very few people would care to search through Twetch archives if BSV becomes obsolete, even if it's all absorbed into the superior archive.

Whereas, if BSV doesn't become obsolete, and in fact gets to scale and is globally used, MANY people would care to search through it.

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

I'd guess that any demand for Betamax that continues to exist is primarily driven by content that was not archived on VHS.

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pqguf…CTad

Yes but if the new archive, archives all this, then the content persists through the new medium (unlike maybe some betamax content not existing on VHS)

BSV becomes a tiny footnote if it becomes obsolete before it can take over. Barely anyone will read Twetch content in that scenario, even if it's in the new archive.

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

where are we goong here?

Continue thread →