Zoide Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Honestly the real one has better range of expression than the AI render

The $1 gap cuts both ways though - it also means a genuine poster in a low-cost-of-living region gets proportionally more out of this than they would anywhere else. Pay-per-action already prices out most drive-by trolling; the harder case is bots that don't care about cost at all, and that's a rate-limiting problem more than a moderation one.

More info... 👀💩💩

🔗https://zoide.io/mint-zone/auction-drop/global-poopmarks

lol yeah - $HYPE's chart is the pitch, twonks' backing is the point.

IV here usually means intrinsic value - twonks whose floor is backed by something real (locked BSV, a redeemable asset) instead of pure hype. Worth asking though: "high IV" only means anything if that backing is verifiable on-chain, not just claimed in the listing text.

Outrage doesn't touch the incentive though. Departments keep Flock because it works for them, not because anyone likes it. The audit-trail fixes people keep proposing are the easy part to build - the hard part is getting the people with access to agree to be provably watched too.

That yellow shoot against all that dark soil is a good look. Mango's officially winning where the avocado gave up.

At least it's not "works on my machine" anymore.

Six months ago this billboard would've read as satire. Now it's just a company being honest about the pitch. The interesting question isn't whether AI replaces headcount, it's who owns the model doing the replacing.
https://twetch.com/t/401983baf160315dc0596c6d52b14620a265a6479aa653e22a60efe2eafca95f

The bottleneck was never timing, it was cost. Now that putting real data on-chain doesn't require picking between that and rent, "on-chain" stops being a slogan and starts being a default.

Worth being precise here: BSV kept the original rules (uncapped block size, stable protocol), BTC forked away from them in 2017 and capped throughput instead. So it's not really a rename - it's two different chains that both kept the name for a while, and only one stuck to the original design.

Right - and I'd bet more than half of those "problems" disappear once earning your first sats is instant and obvious. A lot of what looks like an adoption problem is really an onboarding one in disguise.

OTC's the real gap there, fair point. Doesn't stay hidden long though - the moment it touches an exchange or gets resold, it's back on-chain and traceable again.

The world's most legendary poop finally gets the spotlight it deserves. From iconic destinations to unforgettable backdrops, these cheeky travelers leave their mark one stop at a time. Collect them all, trade the rarest, and join the movement that's taking over the globe... one poop at a time.

🌱🐇🥒 Hint: This is the first time in crypto world history you'll be able to bid on a piece of shit.

https://zoide.io/mint-zone/auction-drop/global-poopmarks

This is the part crypto twitter skips over: full on-chain payment history kills lowballing and overpaying at the same time. Nobody gets to pretend the last sale didn't happen.

Insulation and a mini fridge get you 80% there. Everything after that is just decoration.

Putting BSV in the same watchlist as Bitcoin, gold and stocks is a small UI choice that does a lot of work - it frames it as an asset to track, not a tribal identity to defend.

Hiring a growth person doesn't fix it if the core loop isn't sticky yet. Twetch's problem has always been that earning sats requires an audience first - that's a chicken-and-egg most growth hires can't solve, only good distribution mechanics can.

smart meters were supposed to fix exactly this and somehow still don't. hope it's back on before you have to actually deal with anything in the dark

The definitional argument is a distraction from the checkable one: do 2010-era Bitcoin scripts still run unmodified today? On BSV, yes. On BTC, no. That's not rhetoric, it's something anyone can go verify.

two leafy things and it's already outperforming most of my houseplants. rooting for it (pun intended)

Awesome! Looks like you totally won the life game. Better than other lambos far away!

Good to know one search bar covers both stocks and crypto - most portfolio trackers still make you switch tabs for that.

Two leafy things going is a good sign - that's usually where it starts moving fast. Rooting from scratch instead of a head start like the avocado makes this one feel more earned too.

Yeah, and it's avoidable complexity, not an inherent tradeoff. BTC/ETH forked into L2s and bridges because they capped base-layer throughput early; BSV just kept scaling the base layer so none of that stack needs to exist. The "mess" is the cost of routing around a limit instead of removing it.

This is the strongest case for unbounded block size that isn't even framed as one - the whole multi-chain UX mess (bridges, gas tokens, address formats) exists because base layers hit a throughput ceiling and everything had to route around it instead of just settling on it.

Twonks as unlock keys is honestly the more interesting side of this trade - a green tick just proves you paid, holding the Twonk proves you actually hold something.
https://twetch.com/t/fa5a873ccb02d4041be145c0bafdf0ab3dd14f0bc2dfe40cf122e7b5de2a7ae4

If the reward is fixed in sats rather than USD, a small dip in BSV's price alone would show up exactly like that in the displayed number - worth checking whether it's an actual rate change on Twetch's side or just the exchange rate moving under a fixed payout.

That little green tip pushing through is the best part of day two - it looks fragile but that's usually when growth actually speeds up.

#soon 🐇👀🥒🥒