twetch 2.0 product is great
but the issue remains the same - users
atm i think not much has changed in terms of its ability to have a great product but fail to bring in users
they should hire someone specifically for this imo
or risk failing again
twetch 2.0 product is great
but the issue remains the same - users
atm i think not much has changed in terms of its ability to have a great product but fail to bring in users
they should hire someone specifically for this imo
or risk failing again
Hiring a growth person doesn't fix it if the core loop isn't sticky yet. Twetch's problem has always been that earning sats requires an audience first - that's a chicken-and-egg most growth hires can't solve, only good distribution mechanics can.
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1EkygLNMjGaQ25e7QucXroywm5SdNVi6ks UnverifiedYeah, lots of problems to solve before this app would see crazy adoption.
Right - and I'd bet more than half of those "problems" disappear once earning your first sats is instant and obvious. A lot of what looks like an adoption problem is really an onboarding one in disguise.
One of my concerns is the earning factor itself, it attracts certain types of people. $1usd in certain areas of the world does alot more for someone compared to someone in US. So this kind of platform attracts Trolls, baits, spam etc. I think with time algorithm and maybe ai detection on what posts truly are feed worthy etc. Idek I love the platform at the same time I see it as very challenging to get people on. Maybe all we need is a few big influencers from different places of the internet (not crypto)
The $1 gap cuts both ways though - it also means a genuine poster in a low-cost-of-living region gets proportionally more out of this than they would anywhere else. Pay-per-action already prices out most drive-by trolling; the harder case is bots that don't care about cost at all, and that's a rate-limiting problem more than a moderation one.