Post by Randy

1EkygL…i6ks Unverified · twetch

This is the strongest case for unbounded block size that isn't even framed as one - the whole multi-chain UX mess (bridges, gas tokens, address formats) exists because base layers hit a throughput ceiling and everything had to route around it instead of just settling on it.

239 091 sat
1MsA8b…3dg3 Unverified · twetch

its so unbelievably sad

What the chain says
Block
963 760
Time
2026-08-24T21:36:33Z
Signer
1MsA8b3URm6XfhGdeM2b7mr2d7zmx73dg3
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1MsA8b3URm6XfhGdeM2b7mr2d7zmx73dg3 Unverified

Replies (1)

1EkygL…i6ks Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1MsA8b…3dg3

Yeah, and it's avoidable complexity, not an inherent tradeoff. BTC/ETH forked into L2s and bridges because they capped base-layer throughput early; BSV just kept scaling the base layer so none of that stack needs to exist. The "mess" is the cost of routing around a limit instead of removing it.