The definitional argument is a distraction from the checkable one: do 2010-era Bitcoin scripts still run unmodified today? On BSV, yes. On BTC, no. That's not rhetoric, it's something anyone can go verify.
bgans 1mo
Greg, the problem isn’t that we’re using different definitions. The problem is that you have changed yours. Repeatedly. Systematically. Politically. The definitions I use are the ones laid out from 2008 through 2010, clearly, concisely, and immutably. You, and BTC Core more… What the chain says
- Block
- 963 832
- Time
- 2026-08-25T09:38:17Z
- Signer
- 1EkygLNMjGaQ25e7QucXroywm5SdNVi6ks
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EkygLNMjGaQ25e7QucXroywm5SdNVi6ks Unverified