d a v i d Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Flat Earths are liars or morons. Here is another LIAR trying to fool morons. These people have no morals, they are scum.

First, you post a JPEG of a video to prove a point of motion. LIE.
Second, your source has edited the video to make cuts to make it look like the Earth changed direction. LIE.
Thirdly, your 'shadow' is a piece of paneling that comes out of the shuttle at the 3min mark in the ACTUAL video linked.

Again, there's no mystery or confusion unless your a dullard moron or a content harvesting liar.

They deliberately act dumb about known things and raise strawman points based off their lies. When this gets pointed out, they'll pivot to something about how the shadows are wrong because most people don't understand the difference between global illumination in space and directional illumination on Earth. They do this because most people won't do any research into finding real answers. That helps them continue making content to fool morons for harvesting who will just believe the liars without question. They claim to want to 'break the matrix' but are actually spinning up another layer of matrix with a fake reality to host morons in.

Flat earth relies on you being dumb, lazy and uninterested in truth so they can hustle you to steal your mind. They are energy vampires.

America's first EVA on Gemini 4, by Ed White.

I think it's time we BAN all of the music by Led Zeppelin. Delete their catalog, scorn them publicly, shame them, mock them and destroy their name and legacy for ever. There can by No Quarter (pun intended!).
Why? They were frauds!

They stole music. Forget everything else, forget they are one of the greatest rock bands of all time, forget their amazing concerts, forget all the kids that learnt to play guitar and drums because of their inspiration, forget their legacy on music. It's now all invalid and worthless!

ENOUGH! Led Zeppelin STOLE some music and as we've learnt in the Bitcoin debates, just ONE instance of non-purity means ALL other work is invalid and should be forgotten by history and purged from public minds!

You can't accept the entire legacy of Led Zeppelin if there's even one instance they cheated. This is the new standard of society. Your entire work is meaningless if you dared stray of the path of purity. Only Satoshi is pure as we all know, only Satoshi is the perfect human. Not CSW, not Jimmy Page, even Jesus destroyed a tree that gave him some bad fruit so count him out too, his works are now invalid also!

Just look at this, it's CSW levels of fraud! Why do people even listen to Led Zeppelin anymore, clearly all their work is tainted now because of these aggressions! Their music is no longer worthy of anyone's ears!

• Babe I’m Gonna Leave You - written by Anne Bredon. Zeppelin was sued in the 90’s and paid large back-payments of royalties.

• Dazed & Confused - written by Jake Holmes, Zeppelin took the title, changed the melody & lyrics enough to avoid a lawsuit.

• Black Mountain Side - ‘Inspired by’ Bernt Jansch’s ‘Down By Blackwaterside’, credited to Page.

• How Many More Times - Originally just credited to Zeppelin but since amended to include Howlin’ Wolf’s name.

• Whole Lotta Love - Based off Muddy Waters ‘You Need Love’ by Willie Dixon. Zeppelin was sued in 1985 and courts ruled in favor of Dixon based mostly off the lyrics.

• The Lemon Song - Zeppelin lost a lawsuit in the 70’s, the music almost a copy of Howlin’ Wolf’s ‘Killin’ Floor’.

• Bring It On Home - Another Willie Dixon song, Zeppelin got sued again for no credit

• Since I’ve Been Lovin’ You - VERY similar to Moby Grapes ‘Never’ which was released in 1968. No lawsuit has ever been filed.

• Stairway To Heaven - Zeppelin won this lawsuit filed by the band Spirit who claimed the into was taken from their song Taurus. Argument was that the intro riff is similar to a classical melody both seemingly borrowed and slightly altered.

🎥 Photographing Space - The history of Hasselblad cameras at NASA. 🎥

"Hasselblad and NASA’s journey together began in 1962 during the Mercury program. Prospective NASA astronaut and photography enthusiast Walter Schirra had his own Hasselblad 500C with a Planar f/2.8, 80mm lens.

After buying a few 500Cs, a weight-loss program followed including removal of its leather covering, auxiliary shutter, reflex mirror, and viewfinder. A new film magazine was constructed in order to allow for 70 exposures instead of the usual 12. Finally, a matte black outer paint job minimized reflections in the window of the orbiter. The streamlined Hasselblad would find itself in the payload for Mercury 8 (MA-8) in October 1962. "

"During the Gemini IV mission in 1965, … the first spacewalk was made. And with Hasselblad in hand, James A. McDivitt took a series of pictures of his space-walking colleague, Edward H. White. These pictures were quickly published in leading magazines around the world."

"A silver Hasselblad Data Camera (HDC) with Réseau plate, fitted with a Zeiss Biogon 60mm ƒ/5.6 lens, was chosen to document the lunar surface and attached to astronaut Armstrong's chest. A second black Hasselblad Electric Camera (HEC) with a Zeiss Planar 80mm ƒ/2,8 lens was used to shoot from inside the Eagle lunar module."

"Securely removing the film magazines, both cameras with lenses were left behind on the Moon in order to meet narrow weight margins for successful return. The journeys home from the Moon made very special demands on what could return regarding weight; from Apollo 11 to the final Apollo 17 mission, a total of twelve camera bodies were left behind on the lunar surface. Only the film magazines containing the momentous images were brought back. The resulting photographs captured the history of humanity in the making."

More detail:

🎥 STANLEY KUBRICK AND NASA CONNECTION EXPOSED!!!

Yes it's true! Kubrick did have links with NASA, unfortunately it wasn't in faking a moon landing but rather using the custom Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f/0.7 camera lens designed for the astronauts to photograph the moon. Only 10 of these lenses were made, Kubrick bought 3, NASA bought 6 and Carl Zeiss recieved 1.
He used this custom lens for his movie "Barry Lyndon (1975)" which was shot entirely with natural light - a cinematic feat that required specialized lenses that could produce high quality images in low light settings such as indoors under candle light (or on the moon).
More info:
https://www.domestika.org/en/blog/8022-the-nasa-lens-that-ended-up-in-the-hands-of-stanley-kubrick
https://youtu.be/WOLZMr52Wcc

Call me Santa Claus because here's hundreds of photos of Earth from space:
https://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/

Some nice ones from the Gemini 10 mission showing the curvature of the Earth quite clearly.
https://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/gallery/Gemini/10/Maurer%20Space%20Camera%2070%20mm

Apollo 8 was the first mission that could capture the entire Earth in a single photo, check the 870 high-res scans from the original film of that mission:
https://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/gallery/Apollo/8/Hasselblad%20500EL%2070%20mm

So many photos to choose from!

Kevin 4879 has a troll toll on me so i can't reply to him directly so i'll post this and leave it at that.
He's upset because i said flat earth is aimed at morons. A moron is the medical term for an adult with the mind of a child, its an appropriate term for an adult that discounts ALL science & knowledge to justify fantastical conspiracies like a child trying to understand complex things.
I didn't even single him out or call him a moron directly, he self identified as one by jumping into a flat earth thread and getting offended at the term on his own behalf, tried to insult me by calling me a jew 🤔 (not jewish btw) & then put on a troll toll before i could reply.
What's funny is he probably doesn't know it was the Hebrews that wrote about 'the expanse (raqia)' which was translated by the Greeks into a 'structure (stereoma)' and then translated again into the Latin 'firmamentum' which is why people quote Genesis 1:6 as a 'firmament' as it was written into the English, German and French translations of the King James Bible. The Greek philosophers actually knew the Earth rotated around the sun in 400 BC.
So, his 'dome' ideology was created by Jews who in 500 BC had no concept of gravity, mass, heliocentric solar system, no optics or telescopes, no maths to calculate the elliptical patterns of planets and interpreted space as a ceiling - all the science and math proving we aren't under a dome came later in the 1600's via people like Copernicus, Galileo, Newton (non-Jews) 😂.
Look, flat earth demorolises you into hating reality, it's poisonous to your psyche. Instead of being inspired, instead of being in wonder at the world, instead of seeking out knowledge and all the amazing human achievements throughout time, your trained to believe your existence is fake and it's all a lie. It's very sad. 😪

Take the troll toll off if you want to debate, what a weak and pathetic move by someone not confident in their theories.
I'll reply to my own post instead if that's the way it is:

• Wales doesn't have a 4000 ft mountain. First lie.

• You can't see 8 Swiss Alps from a mountain in Wales. Second lie.
  You learnt this lie from a youtube video mistaking clouds with mountains. You have never observed this with your own eyes to prove it to yourself. Why do you let people lie to you?

• Water is a molecule, water doesn't transform into something else when it becomes a body of water. A droplet is curved water. You said water never curves.

Kevin!
How many H20's do you need to make a 'water'.

• Do flat earth scientists offer an official number in which many H20's transform into a 'water'? If so, how many H20's did they calculate it takes until it becomes water?
• Why does combining 2 hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom make water suddenly unable to curve? What is the explanation for this in flat earth science?
• Have flat earth scientists done any molecular studies on why H20 doesn't curve if they believe 'water never curves'? Can they prove H20 only strings in a straight line and what force is dictating this phenomenon? Is it reproducible and observable at a molecular level?
• Why does water form a sphere under the influence of gravity if it can't form curves? What is happening?

We think of wine today as an alcoholic drink but in the past there wine was brewed for many reasons - mostly as a way to sterilise water to make it safe to drink. Babies were often nursed on a type wine and beer that hadn't been brewed into alcohol because there were beliefs mothers milk was toxic (which is why babies often died so young, this is documented in Mozarts letters in the late 1700's about his new born being fed this brew which of course, died).
There was low alcohol wine where the majority of alcohol is cooked out and there was higher alcohol wine to get drunk.
So Wine covered many different types of drinks.
Wine in regards to Jesus is referring to the 'blood of Christ'. The blood of Christ is the spirit. So when Jesus turns 'water into wine' he's turning the base spirit into the Christ spirit. He's not converting barrels of water into party wine, he's converting the gathering of souls into spirit. That is the miracle, changing minds - revolutionary.
When Jesus heals the blind so they can see again, he isn't re-arranging the DNA in their eyes and brain using Godly powers of magic so they can visually see, he's teaching them how to see God within because you may be blind outwardly but with the right teaching you can see God internally with perfect vision.
What is the greater miracle? Helping one blind person to see again or teaching humanity how to see properly?

What is the single proof that he could provide that would satisfy everyone? That's the problem and he's already calculated that is a failed approach because it will just cause more attacks and new rounds of abuse. It's frustrating everyone because everyone is financially invested in tokens and want to make money, unfortunately for all of us CSW doesn't care about token value because the value to him is in the IP.
The autistic super genius technical planner is trying to lay out a body of work over a couple decades that explains why he was able to create Bitcoin in the first place and why it's illogical to think it just appeared out of the blue by an Anon who then vanished into a cloud of smoke and never touched the $billions thereafter.