you are both being too harsh. (1). there is a point to saying 'your disagreement boils down to semantics' -- when it is meant that words in an argument are being used equivocally.
Post by twetch#3613
example: ALICE: "this is not art, it's ugly". BOB: "it may be ugly, but it's still art". COOL_DADDY: "ALICE, BOB, you do not even mean the same thing by 'art' at all. your discussion is futile unless you come to terms with this semantic fact."
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 782
- Time
- 2020-05-06T20:28:36Z
- Signer
- 12N7eqfTTkjkYueQ5f12tPJ1JLXk2BW6sn
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3613
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
12N7eqfTTkjkYueQ5f12tPJ1JLXk2BW6sn VerifiedReplies (1)
(2). wittgenstein identified some very general conditions for there to be meaningful discourse. exceedingly interesting stuff.