The last time someone said this to me I said "You must be a fan of Wittgenstein" and she didn't know what I was talking about.
Post by twetch#3613
you are both being too harsh. (1). there is a point to saying 'your disagreement boils down to semantics' -- when it is meant that words in an argument are being used equivocally.
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 781
- Time
- 2020-05-06T20:21:11Z
- Signer
- 12N7eqfTTkjkYueQ5f12tPJ1JLXk2BW6sn
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3613
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
12N7eqfTTkjkYueQ5f12tPJ1JLXk2BW6sn VerifiedReplies (2)
example: ALICE: "this is not art, it's ugly". BOB: "it may be ugly, but it's still art". COOL_DADDY: "ALICE, BOB, you do not even mean the same thing by 'art' at all. your discussion is futile unless you come to terms with this semantic fact."
(2). wittgenstein identified some very general conditions for there to be meaningful discourse. exceedingly interesting stuff.