Peck by twetch#190

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Remember when CWS said adding privacy, eliminating ability to do chain analysis, and doing mixers was crucial to bitcoin and he was about to release it?

What the chain says

Transaction: ea7573d5fc28f3994fe147e20e56bfa1076f540fc87fd86e95ae269109c73df1
Block: 665 720
Time: 2020-12-15T17:19:19Z
Signer: 1KJBLu2QbTgzcxXxS5vuhSFvQBCy9s2wYy
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#190

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1KJBLu2QbTgzcxXxS5vuhSFvQBCy9s2wYy Verified

Reposted by (1)

twetch#4245 Reposted · 5.8y

Replies (19)

twetch#116 5.8y

1Jvg1G…CC1L Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

I memba.

But Roger Ver bad.

Crime.

Lawr.

Risk.

Finance.

twetch#190 5.8y

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Replying to@1Jvg1G…CC1L

I thought you were drunk and high at the time?

twetch#16028 5.8y

1BVZCW…Uhk3 Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Nah, that was me. Still am.

Anyway, this was a strange period just prior to the final BCH bitcoin depredation.
There was another video where Craig detailed one such possibility. It had nothing to do with mixers or funging up the core protocol.

twetch#16028 5.8y

1BVZCW…Uhk3 Key · twetch

Replying to@1BVZCW…Uhk3

Hint: IPv6 in that example.

Nuther Hint: After the final split, one the first things Craig started explaining about bitcoin that no one ever got, was what the true intent of SPV was all along.

CSW may have been in full-on troll mode at that point.

Continue thread →

twetch#4245 5.8y

1Gwece…AV6R Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

What are your thoughts on that topic?

I was convinced by his argument for privacy and against anonymity.

Anonymous coins would take the risk (money handover) out of a lot of crimes.

twetch#190 5.8y

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

I like the option to have both.

twetch#4245 5.8y

1Gwece…AV6R Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Fair enough.

So far I have never heard a good argument on how to deal with the fact that kidnapping and extortion would lose most of their risk with anonymous coins becoming wide spread.

But maybe it's just a trade off.

twetch#190 5.8y

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

Yeah it's an important point. But we have lots of stuff today and through history that is equally hard to trace, and people tend to find innovative solutions more adaptable than blanket trace-ability 100% of the time baked in.

twetch#2283 5.8y

1JhqXx…piRT Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

He was just working to trap criminals like Adam Back bro

twetch#190 5.8y

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Replying to@1JhqXx…piRT

6D chess. Trust Great Man with the Great Plan!

twetch#3741 5.8y

18bmuQ…sGrQ Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Issac, privacy is different from anonymity, and accountability is different from surveillance.

twetch#190 5.8y

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Replying to@18bmuQ…sGrQ

I agree. But CSW was explicitly endorsing things he explicitly denounces now, less than two years later.

twetch#116 5.8y

1Jvg1G…CC1L Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Here is the earliest version of Bitcoin.org, November 1 2008.

twetch#678 5.8y

1E5wYa…Ycfh Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

arguably CAAL funded handcash already does mixing when you send

and he is right that a huge transaction volume makes you more anon

but yeah

Many of us got into bitcoin because we wanted monero.

twetch#20825 5.8y

14mTHt…PnNz Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Maybe Roger Ver had some influence on him during that time. Or he thought it would help BCH win more adoption against BTC. CSW has been mostly consistent from what I can see with some blunders like you point out. I believe we must go off of the now.

twetch#7634 5.8y

1JGRKv…xjwm Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Yes I remember.

twetch#6218 5.8y

1EzXMD…yKaw Key · twetch

Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

he probably doesnt believe most of the lawr things he is saying now. but i am sure he believes its best for business.

Post by twetch#190

Reposted by (1)

Replies (19)