Post by twetch#116

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch

Remember when CWS said adding privacy, eliminating ability to do chain analysis, and doing mixers was crucial to bitcoin and he was about to release it?

1Jvg1G…CC1L Key · twetch

I memba.

But Roger Ver bad.

Crime.

Lawr.

Risk.

Finance.

What the chain says
Block
665 721
Time
2020-12-15T17:26:59Z
Signer
1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#116

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L Verified

Replies (5)

1KJBLu…2wYy Key · twetch
Replying to@1Jvg1G…CC1L

I thought you were drunk and high at the time?

1BVZCW…Uhk3 Key · twetch
Replying to@1KJBLu…2wYy

Nah, that was me. Still am.

Anyway, this was a strange period just prior to the final BCH bitcoin depredation.
There was another video where Craig detailed one such possibility. It had nothing to do with mixers or funging up the core protocol.

1BVZCW…Uhk3 Key · twetch
Replying to@1BVZCW…Uhk3

Hint: IPv6 in that example.

Nuther Hint: After the final split, one the first things Craig started explaining about bitcoin that no one ever got, was what the true intent of SPV was all along.

CSW may have been in full-on troll mode at that point.

1BVZCW…Uhk3 Key · twetch
Replying to@1BVZCW…Uhk3

That point in time being right before the CSW Hong Kong Long Dong Showdown and public pubic bashing of Roger the dodger. By then, the gig was just about up on Craig's covert mission (according to Craig).

Anyway, it doesn't matter.

Continue thread →