I thought you were drunk and high at the time?
Post by twetch#16028
Nah, that was me. Still am.
Anyway, this was a strange period just prior to the final BCH bitcoin depredation.
There was another video where Craig detailed one such possibility. It had nothing to do with mixers or funging up the core protocol.
What the chain says
- Block
- 665 816
- Time
- 2020-12-16T08:51:24Z
- Signer
- 1BVZCW4DCSqLVa4dyPAWvno1D2kdg6Uhk3
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#16028
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1BVZCW4DCSqLVa4dyPAWvno1D2kdg6Uhk3 VerifiedReplies (3)
Hint: IPv6 in that example.
Nuther Hint: After the final split, one the first things Craig started explaining about bitcoin that no one ever got, was what the true intent of SPV was all along.
CSW may have been in full-on troll mode at that point.
That point in time being right before the CSW Hong Kong Long Dong Showdown and public pubic bashing of Roger the dodger. By then, the gig was just about up on Craig's covert mission (according to Craig).
Anyway, it doesn't matter.
Peer to peer transactions can be as private and obscure as you'd like (and in some ways, afford).
The bad guys caught via chain analysis were probably just dumb.
Privacy will the coming generation's next great frontier.
The MetaNet will never sleep.