Can somebody make real whitepaper Bitcoin? It still doesn't exist. Sure BSV is closest but then it has NAR/DAR and removed 0 sat UTXO's.
574 068 sat
Post by Badger
Only an absolute retard would support 0 sat utxo. If you want a 0sat tx knock yourself out, just don't expect it to be on chain. That's some commie shit.
277 296 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 957 677
- Time
- 2026-07-13T12:51:41Z
- Signer
- 1CSTsZaRufaiCozKZKgseTCrU6uGFLtWjT
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CSTsZaRufaiCozKZKgseTCrU6uGFLtWjT VerifiedReplies (20)
At least you aren't pro NAR/DAR (or maybe you AR)
I only know them at a high level so there may be details that are deal breakers, but the general concepts I agree with. However, what I don't agree with is how they came about, and the BSVA authority. If BSVA was appointed by Satoshi sure, or if Satoshi signed affirming.
276 816 sat
Exactly. We're all BSVA haha, but really money should never have leaders.
The system without confiscation is an existential threat to global stability.
a system without rights is also dangerous there has to be a balance, if no common law, then mob rules and we all lose expect for the leaders of the mob
Seize the means of output
Well, someone put it in the code. Not by accident, but willingly and knowingly. Is that the retard you are referring to? Serious question.
BSV is still fake bitcoin.
It's hilarious that everyone is arguing over which Bitcoin is the real one, and none of them are 🤣
I don't operate under the cult like assumption that Satoshi is infallible.
549 461 sat
Not infallible as in "somehow put it in there by accident" or as in "put it in there on purpose, but later on changed his mind"?
Where does Satoshi positively affirm 0 sat tx? The code snippet (what I can see from shit crop) looks like basic error handling. The absence of negation does not imply affirmation. The error handling is to prevent exploitable code paths, not document network rules.
275 957 sat
Facts no one is.
Big Wright guy by the way.
Don't you just have to account for every possibility? I can't see the economics working with zero or negative