Well, someone put it in the code. Not by accident, but willingly and knowingly. Is that the retard you are referring to? Serious question.
Post by Admiral XYZ™
0-sat inputs are the most glaringly obvious example of why there's a 0% chance he wrote the Satoshi code. Removing them from the protocol would just be the icing on the cake at this point.
278 164 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 957 688
- Time
- 2026-07-13T13:59:26Z
- Signer
- 1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1PqgufE2YSYkUfx8cWQEbFExZMpNmnCTad VerifiedReplies (2)
BSV is still fake bitcoin.
It's hilarious that everyone is arguing over which Bitcoin is the real one, and none of them are 🤣