Post by Actual Ayyy

1CSTsZ…tWjT Key · twetch

Only an absolute retard would support 0 sat utxo. If you want a 0sat tx knock yourself out, just don't expect it to be on chain. That's some commie shit.

277 296 sat
18xXxq…a31p Key · twetch

At least you aren't pro NAR/DAR (or maybe you AR)

What the chain says
Block
957 677
Time
2026-07-13T12:51:41Z
Signer
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p Verified

Replies (5)

1CSTsZ…tWjT Key · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

I only know them at a high level so there may be details that are deal breakers, but the general concepts I agree with. However, what I don't agree with is how they came about, and the BSVA authority. If BSVA was appointed by Satoshi sure, or if Satoshi signed affirming.

276 816 sat
1Ce1Jk…tiJV Key · twetch
Replying to@1CSTsZ…tWjT

Exactly. We're all BSVA haha, but really money should never have leaders.

18xXxq…a31p Key · twetch
Replying to@1CSTsZ…tWjT

The system without confiscation is an existential threat to global stability.

1GN4KT…u3Sm Key · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

a system without rights is also dangerous there has to be a balance, if no common law, then mob rules and we all lose expect for the leaders of the mob

18xXxq…a31p Key · twetch
Replying to@1GN4KT…u3Sm

I'm confident that the people truly controlling the world here are benevolent utilitarian, so I'm not really worried about it.