Post by 1JHLUK…2RN4

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch

The simple fact is that women AS A GROUP receive more benefits than they pay taxes.

As a group, they take more out of the system then they put in.

This means that when women vote, they decide on things they don't pay for.

It's like letting children vote for ice-cream: they will vote yes and someone else has to pay for it.

Am I saying women shouldn't vote? No. I'm saying if you vote in favor of something, you should pay for it, not those who were against it.

244 498 sat
Unverified · twetch

LOL, but that is democracy........mob-rule!

What the chain says
Block
965 286
Time
2026-09-04T13:39:42Z
Signer
1JHLUKKYKDPDMZofq8eqqEVR4nRsQo2RN4
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1JHLUKKYKDPDMZofq8eqqEVR4nRsQo2RN4 Unverified

Replies (7)

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1JHLUK…2RN4

Yes. Soft, slow-motion communism.

244 498 sat
Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

The question is, what is a better way of governance?

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1JHLUK…2RN4

Better than giving psychopath the privilege to violate your most fundamental rights with impunity?

I'd rather self-organize, thank you.

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

I prefer self-organisation too, but what about those people that don't have morals or take responsibility?

Continue thread →