Yes. Soft, slow-motion communism.
244 498 sat
Post by 1JHLUK…2RN4
The question is, what is a better way of governance?
What the chain says
- Block
- 965 289
- Time
- 2026-09-04T13:50:51Z
- Signer
- 1JHLUKKYKDPDMZofq8eqqEVR4nRsQo2RN4
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1JHLUKKYKDPDMZofq8eqqEVR4nRsQo2RN4 UnverifiedReplies (5)
Better than giving psychopath the privilege to violate your most fundamental rights with impunity?
I'd rather self-organize, thank you.
I prefer self-organisation too, but what about those people that don't have morals or take responsibility?
Why would you want them to be part of your society?
I wouldn't........but that would mean there would still have to be rules/protocols in order for me to exclude them.