The question is, what is a better way of governance?
Post by Y
Better than giving psychopath the privilege to violate your most fundamental rights with impunity?
I'd rather self-organize, thank you.
What the chain says
- Block
- 965 292
- Time
- 2026-09-04T14:03:53Z
- Signer
- 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R UnverifiedReplies (4)
I prefer self-organisation too, but what about those people that don't have morals or take responsibility?
Why would you want them to be part of your society?
I wouldn't........but that would mean there would still have to be rules/protocols in order for me to exclude them.
Freedom in human society doesn't mean no rules, it means no rulers.
A ruler is someone who can break the rules (individual rights).
No rules: chaos
Rulers: control
Same rules for everyone: order
237 670 sat