Post by twetch#3375

1PBarv…BkHq Key · twetch

Since I don't own mining equipment, what is the difference between the costly signal of paying matterpool as a costly signal vs paying Baemail/the recipient as a costly signal?

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch

Someone can accept payment for emails without actually reading them. With proof-of-work, it's the recipient's incentive to set the difficulty to the point where they want to read everything they get.

What the chain says
Block
632 733
Time
2020-04-29T20:00:29Z
Signer
1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#3375

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm Verified

Replies (4)

1DCqB8…QjKV Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

As the recipient it is in my interest to get the payment that would otherwise go to a mining pool to attach that PoW.

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@1DCqB8…QjKV

Yes but it's not in the sender's interest to use that system as much. PoW aligns the interest of both parties.

1DCqB8…QjKV Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

It is in the sender's interest to do what is in the recipient's interest, if the sender wants to maximize the chance that the recipient reads the message.

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch
Replying to@1DCqB8…QjKV

That's just manipulation.