but then uploading on chain is pointless
when LaMint goes down then you no longer have access
Post by Ironshirtz
you are basically paying for the hash
to prove the image you bought is the image that was advertised
What the chain says
- Block
- 964 106
- Time
- 2026-08-27T08:10:27Z
- Signer
- 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF UnverifiedReplies (12)
So you mean this doesn't actually mean owning the on-chain content itself, right?
How do you "own" anything that is on a public blockchain?
It is basically in the public domain,
If you encrypt it
only the hash and timestamp becomes relevant really
If you cannot pick up your ball
and take it home so nobody else can play with it
is it really your ball ?
Answer is no…
NFT tech really just lets you claim who currently owns the token, and that’s about it.
240 674 sat
Soon...
This is a bad analogy.
The ball is only yours if you are in a system which rules allow you to do that, meaning that it will punish those who try to violate them, or you are the strongest person in the field.
What is wrong with encrypting data on chain and sharing access to it?
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.