Let's say you pay a costly signal to draw attention to your content.
If that costly signal is paying the content producer, it's a false signal. No real cost was paid (or, the cost was small compared to the size of the signal.)
Post by twetch#622
If, however, the signal requires mining, whether that's paid for or done for yourself (some subtle differences there, too,) then you can't reliably pay yourself that way.
What the chain says
- Block
- 632 697
- Time
- 2020-04-29T07:51:08Z
- Signer
- 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#622
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C VerifiedReplies (6)
However, if your costly signal is tied to content filtering (higher cost => higher attention,) but the profit is tied to attention rather than judgment of the value, you get into a situation where "aggressive mimicry" comes in...
In that case, it's the attention that is being rewarded, NOT the valuable content.
Instead of being like antlers, this is more like an anglerfish lure.
The signal is "come get this good thing," and the result is you pay, but may get a good thing, or may find your payment is food for a "predator" in that system.
No value to you, but you paid the price anyways.
Predator lives on, profitably.
I think there may be a solution to this, but... Needs more work before I would call it good.