@24 Sometimes a costly signal just means that the person is signaling bad judgement. This is often the case.
Post by twetch#3375
Costly signals are proportional to value ON AVERAGE.
What the chain says
- Block
- 632 075
- Time
- 2020-04-24T22:11:20Z
- Signer
- 1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3375
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm VerifiedReplies (4)
I looked at your Boost Whitepaper and saw nothing to contradict my initial intuition. Boost is good for Many-to-one and Many-to-Many signals...but one-to-one and one-to-many are natively handled well by Bitcoin without adding this layer of abstraction.
I'd like to encourage you to send in a question for Daniel to the event on Tuesday. Would you be so kind as to ask it via this link? https://baemail.me/@sflondon <-- you could even choose to use Bitcoin (Pay) to signal one-to-many if you like.
Done. Thanks for the encouragement.
Right! Costly signals are for when there is competition for attention. If there is only one person talking then there is no competition.