Yeah we need something to happen like price decoupling from the rest of the market to make the devs on other chains notice BSV and want to build on it.
Post by Ironshirtz
Welcome to 2019...
250 941 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 132
- Time
- 2026-08-20T10:17:15Z
- Signer
- 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF UnverifiedReplies (17)
Well I'm sure 2020 will be good right. What could possibly go wrong in 2020.
BTC will no longer be around in 2020,
so there is that to look forward too
250 626 sat
There is still time left (one week to go) for this prediction to be fulfilled. On Twitter 27 August 2021, “Coinbase will not exist in 5 years because of ignoring BSV and customers". Calvin. He was replying to the Coingeek article "Coinbase ignores pleas of hacked customers, but the law offers a solution”
Of course, LaW.
I don't think Coinbase is going anywhere anytime soon lol.
I saw someone on the Babbage meet up a few weeks ago saying the miners need to run Teranode and drop BSV node to be able push the super high tps numbers BSV is capable of. A sustained high tps test could get attention.
They don't promote their tests as public tests
they should have done a stresstest on mainnet same date every year
ever since the first one when bitcoin was BCH
and it would be an annual showcase everyone could get behind
now nobody cares because the tests are random and many then try to claim those transactions as organic
seems like they are pushing teranode to push out competition,
look how electrumSV guys are being treated recently
why bring in new nodes that destroy current wallets when there is currently no demand for teranode
TBH i am surprised they did not just reboot the chain with teranode and start from 0, as it would make clear sense to do so at this point.
250 313 sat
If a month's on end test was ever to occur it would completely obliterate every single argument against scaling. It would melt faces. However, the setup and the cost would be absolutely staggering to do such a test. Nah, Hollywood AI movie is a better spend of resources. 😂
250 234 sat
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.